|
Other topics
|
Consider the impact of policy in a system.
Policy is usually an attempt to make clear
The purpose of policy is to make it easier for everyone to do well with their tasks.
However outcomes are achieved in other contexts beyond the scope of the policy.
At a lower level policy may
Policy is well intentioned - it is designed to help ensure that the outcomes match the purposes. But ...
Policy often degenerates into a control system as it matures. It readily becomes a way of assigning responsibility to those lower in the organization (often without the necessary authority, resources). It is rare for policy to remove responsibility to a higher level in an organization.
Programs, appearing to incorporate well thought-out processes, move the focus to a recipe for those with the responsibility. The original processes become less lively and end up being what one person does to another. This is the most common reason why perfectly sound programs must be replaced.
This degeneration is a result of the shrinking of attention to the tangible more easily specified things: tasks, assignment of tasks, use of resources, outputs.
The outcome of this (largely unconscious process) is that attention moves from the lively original purposes and actual outcomes to lifeless compliance with the policy itself. Even quality is vulnerable to such decline.
Two stories explain this phenomenon well
The antidote is simple, challenging and life giving:
[Manage your policy or it will mange you. Don't abdicate]
Deming's work addresses these issues very nicely. |