|
Other topics
| A case study of tampering.
At Riverside Primary School 'Friday Sport' involves 200 children in Years 5 & 6 engaging in a range of sports matches with teams from several other schools. This involves the movement of teams to and from several locations around Launceston with coordination of travel and timelines: each bus carries a few teams to/from two or three locations.
The system works well. The Physical Education teacher initiates the operation PE teacher (1) schedules times, teams (inc. numbers), staff, buses and locations (2) prints the schedule (1 page) and forwards it to Office Then the Office staff (2) Copy & distribute the schedule to teachers & classes (4) Book the necessary buses to transport the teams Teachers and students (5) prepare for participation, (6) organise equipment, uniforms... Parents and other family members often attend matches to support their children
And so on.... however, one week ....
...the School was also having an evening Fair on the Friday, a social event and fund-raiser combined. So the Office staff were very busy with extra tasks.
The Physical Education teacher tried to be helpful but ended up tampering with the system. The PE teacher decided to copy and distribute the schedule to the teachers and classes concerned, thus saving the Office staff the effort and time involved in completing this particular task. This was certainly kind, thoughtful and very well intentioned.
However, no-one remembered to book the buses because
And so when everyone was ready to move at 1.00 PM on the Friday... nothing happened!! And it was too late to retrieve the situation.
The results:
WARNING: Being helpful is a risky business!! It introduces variation into the process and may bring that whole process undone. That is the cost of tampering. |