Homepage
Site Index
----------------
Up Brief history StIMS Background History re StIMS Communication System StIMS 2008
See also...
| |
A brief chronology
of the Planner
1997-2000
-
Developed at Riverside Primary to better plan, manage, and monitor the
provision of support to students with particular needs.
- Data
included
-
History
-
Support Actions
- Needs
ratings for all students in key areas
- Reports
for
- Classes,
- Support team
meetings
- Class
placements....
- Support
Provider To-do lists
- A small
number of Launceston schools began using the Planner
Ongoing development
of the Support Planner:
2001-2010
More schools
and one support service adopt the use of the Planner: currently ~60 schools
in (northern) Tasmania and NSW
Ongoing
collaborative development based largely on user needs, insights and
suggestions. Improvements include
-
Incidents & Resolutions
-
Contacts
-
Timetable
- Alerts
-
Document Management
- Agreements
- Other
Observations
- Student
Goal
-
Individual Support Plans
- Daily
Monitoring
-
Functional summary
- ...
and numerous
reports (tools) for use with staff, students and parents
- Support Meeting
agenda
- Individual
Support Plan
- Parent
Information
-
Transition
-
Incident Stats (various)
- Weekly
Checklist
- ...
Related DoE
actions
1998-2004
- Senior Officers
aware of the Planner and support its use
2004
- DoE
commits to development of Student Support Module
2005-06
- DoE
Stakeholder consultations and development of a brief for SS Module
- Resulting brief
95% consistent with the Planner
- That is, the
Planner is effectively a prototype for what schools are hoping for.
2006
- Student
at the Centre reorganisation of the Department
-
Redistribution of responsibilities resulted in SS Module being lost in
the process
2008
- Student
Support Module rediscovered
- Development
reactivated by senior officers and then
- Stopped
due to the Global Financial Crisis
2010
- New
Laptops underline the technical limitations of the Planner in its
current form.
-
Minister announces choice and use of software is local school decision.
- Loss of
knowledge between schools, and between schools and the system, remains a
key issue
- Schools
respond seeking to have a system-wide device developed and deployed
| |
|